Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributorUniversitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna
dc.contributor.authorTorné, Alba
dc.contributor.authorReguant, Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorSanromà, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorPiriz, Marta
dc.contributor.authorRoca, Judith
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Expósito, Judith
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T14:28:36Z
dc.date.available2025-10-01T14:28:36Z
dc.date.created2023-12
dc.date.issued2024-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5543
dc.description.abstractBackground: Phlebitis related to peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) is a common complication in patients who require these devices and can have important consequences for the patients and the healthcare system. The management and control of the PVC-associated complications is related to nursing competency. The present study aims to determine, at the national level in Spain, the consensus on the assessment, treatment, and follow-up of PVC-related phlebitis and the importance of the actions taken. Method: A three-round Delphi technique was used with clinical care nurses who are experts in the field of in-hospital intravenous treatment in Spain. For this, an online questionnaire was developed with three open-ended questions on the dimensions of phlebitis assessment, treatment, and follow-up. For the statistical analysis of the results, frequencies and percentages were used to determine consensus, and the measures of central tendency (mean, standard deviation, and the coefficient of variation) were used to rank importance. The coefficient of variation was set as acceptable at ≤30%. Results: The final sample was 27 expert nurses. At the conclusion of round 3, actions were ranked according to their importance, with six items included in the PVC-related phlebitis assessment (symptomatology/observation, redness, the Maddox scale, induration, temperature, and pain), two in treatment (catheter removal, pentosan polysulphate sodium ointment + application of cold), and just one in follow-up (general monitoring + temperature control). Conclusions: There is a major disparity in relation to the PVC-related phlebitis assessment, treatment, and follow-up actions. More clinical studies are therefore needed to minimise the complications associated with the use of PVCs, given their impact on the quality of care and patient safety and their economic cost.ca
dc.format.extent14 p.ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofHealthcare, 2024, 12(3): 378ca
dc.rights© L'autor/aca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherMètode Delphica
dc.subject.otherCateterisme intravascularca
dc.subject.otherInfermeriaca
dc.subject.otherFlebitisca
dc.titleAssessment, treatment, and follow-up of phlebitis related to peripheral venous catheterisation: A Delphi study in Spainca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030378ca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca


Ficheros en el ítem

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

© L'autor/a
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Compartir en TwitterCompartir en LinkedinCompartir en FacebookCompartir en TelegramCompartir en WhatsappImprimir