dc.contributor | Universitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna | |
dc.contributor | Grup de Recerca Global Research on Wellbeing - GRoW | |
dc.contributor.author | Carrillo Álvarez, Elena | |
dc.contributor.author | Boeckx, Hilde | |
dc.contributor.author | Penne, Tess | |
dc.contributor.author | Palma-Linares, Imma | |
dc.contributor.author | Storms, Bérénice | |
dc.contributor.author | Goedemé, Tim | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-08T11:26:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-08T11:26:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/4154 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The purpose of this article is to report on a comparative analysis of the official food-based dietary
guidelines (FBDG) that were applicable in 2015 in 25 EU Member States. We assess FBDG in relation to the main
guidelines established by the FAO/WHO, the EURODIET project and the EFSA, with a particular focus on identifying strengths and limitations of current FBDG in Europe towards addressing diet-related health inequalities.
Methods: This is a review research, in which a mixed-methods sequenced procedure was utilized. In each EU
country key informants, including sociologists, economists, dietitians and nutritionists were asked to provide
data regarding: (i) current dietary guidelines and national health priorities, (ii) model of health promotion
currently available, (iii) results of the latest food consumption survey. All documents were reviewed by the
coordinating team. Full data were analysed by two nutritionists, using a tabulated sheet to organize and
compare the results. Results: While all countries have national FBDG, the level of detail and quality varies substantially with regard to: time of last update; availability of recommendations for specific target groups; specification of frequency and portion size; the graphical representation; recommended amounts and limits of foods consumed; and recommendations regarding physical activity. Conclusions: European countries have great
opportunities to improve FBDG to better serve Public Health policy through a more consistent foundation of
how these guidelines are developed, the inclusion of different population subgroups as a target for recommendations and the implementation of monitoring systems. | ca |
dc.format.extent | 8 p. | ca |
dc.language.iso | eng | ca |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | ca |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Public Health, 2020, 30(2): 346-353 | ca |
dc.rights | © Oxford University Press. Tots els drets reservats | ca |
dc.subject.other | Exercici | ca |
dc.subject.other | Alimentació | ca |
dc.subject.other | Nutrició | ca |
dc.subject.other | Prioritats en salut | ca |
dc.subject.other | Promoció de la salut | ca |
dc.subject.other | Organització Mundial de la Salut | ca |
dc.subject.other | Salut pública | ca |
dc.subject.other | Desigualtats en salut | ca |
dc.subject.other | Directrius en nutrició | ca |
dc.title | A comparison of European countries FBDG in the light of their contribution to tackle diet-related health inequalities | ca |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca |
dc.rights.accessLevel | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.embargo.terms | cap | ca |
dc.subject.udc | 613 | ca |
dc.subject.udc | 614 | ca |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz139 | ca |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion/VC/2013/0554 | ca |
dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ca |