Show simple item record

dc.contributorUniversitat Ramon Llull. IQS
dc.contributor.authorCanalejo Codina, Francesc
dc.contributor.authorCano Morenilla, Mariola
dc.contributor.authorMartorell López, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorBalcells Camps, Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorPegueroles, Marta
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Granada, Andrés-Amador
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-14T12:42:56Z
dc.date.available2025-02-14T12:42:56Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-22
dc.identifier.issn1873-4197ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/4913
dc.description.abstractPolymer-based bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) aim to reduce the long-term issues associated with metal stents. Yet, first-generation BRS designs experienced a significantly higher rate of clinical failures compared to permanent implants. This prompted the development of alternative scaffolds, such as the poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) solvent-casted stent, whose mechanical performance has yet to be addressed. This study examines the mechanical behavior of this novel scaffold across a wide range of parallel and radial compression diameters. The analysis highlights the scaffold’s varying responses under different loading conditions and provides insights into interpreting simulation model parameters to accurately reflect experimental results. Stents demonstrated a parallel crush resistance of 0.11 N/mm at maximum compression, whereas the radial forces were significantly higher, reaching up to 1.80 N/mm. Additionally, the parallel test keeps the stent in the elastic regime, with almost no regions exceeding 50 MPa of stress, while the radial test causes significant structural deformation, with localized plastic strain reaching up to 30 %. Results showed that underestimating yield strain in computational models leads to discrepancies with experimental results, being 5 % the most accurate value for matching computational and experimental results for PLCL solvent-casted stents. This comprehensive approach is vital for optimizing BRS design and predicting clinical performance.ca
dc.format.extent11 p.ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherElsevierca
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials & Design. 2024;247:113395ca
dc.rights© L'autor/aca
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherAdditive manufacturingca
dc.subject.otherBioresorbable stentca
dc.subject.otherPoly(L-lactide-coε-caprolactone)ca
dc.subject.otherMechanical performanceca
dc.subject.otherCrush resistanceca
dc.subject.otherFinite element analysisca
dc.title3D printed polymeric stent design: Mechanical testing and computational modelingca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.subject.udc61ca
dc.subject.udc617ca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113395ca
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Generalitat de Catalunya/SGR/2021SGR-01368ca
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIN/PN I+D/PID2021-124868OB-C22ca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© L'autor/a
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint