Show simple item record

dc.contributorUniversitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport Blanquerna
dc.contributorUniversitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Ciències de la Salut
dc.contributor.authorHuertas, Pol
dc.contributor.authorBuscà Safont-Tria, Bernat
dc.contributor.authorArboix-Alió, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorMiró, Adrià
dc.contributor.authorEsquerrà, Laia H.
dc.contributor.authorPeña, Javier
dc.contributor.authorVicens-Bordas, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorAguilera-Castells, Joan
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-13T15:39:36Z
dc.date.available2025-02-13T15:39:36Z
dc.date.issued2025-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/4910
dc.description.abstractTraining using instability devices is common; however, for highly trained athletes, a single device may not provide sufficient challenge. This study examines the effect of superimposed vibration in suspended kneeling rollout. Seventeen physically active participants performed the exercise with non-vibration, vibration at 25 Hz, and vibration at 40 Hz. Muscle activation of the pectoralis clavicularis, pectoralis sternalis, anterior deltoid, serratus anterior, infraspinatus, and latissimus dorsi was recorded during exercise, and the perception of effort was recorded after exercise (OMNI-Res scale). One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences for the kneeling rollout (p < 0.05). Friedman’s test showed significant differences in the OMNI-Res (p = 0.003). Pairwise comparison showed significant differences in the anterior deltoid (p = 0.004), latissimus dorsi (p < 0.001), infraspinatus (p = 0.001), and global activity (p < 0.001) between the 25 Hz and non-vibration conditions. It also showed significant differences between the 40 Hz and non-vibration conditions for pectoralis sternalis (p = 0.021), anterior deltoid (p = 0.005), latissimus dorsi (p < 0.001), infraspinatus (p = 0.027), and global activity (p < 0.001). The post hoc Conover pairwise comparison showed significant differences in the OMNI-Res only between the non-vibration and vibration at 40 Hz conditions (p = 0.011). Superimposed vibration increases the muscle activation of the upper limbs when performing the suspended kneeling rollout.ca
dc.format.extent15ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherMDPIca
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences. 2025, 15(3), 1637ca
dc.rights© L'autor/aca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherElectromiografiaca
dc.subject.otherEstabilitatca
dc.subject.otherEntrenament en suspensióca
dc.subject.otherBraçosca
dc.titleMuscle Activity of Superimposed Vibration in Suspended Kneeling Rolloutca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app15031637ca
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/SUR del DEC i FSE/2020 FI_B2 00126ca
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/URL i La Caixa/Projectes recerca PDI/R26/2019ca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© L'autor/a
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint