Show simple item record

dc.contributorUniversitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport Blanquerna
dc.contributor.authorLongworth, Giuliana R.
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Kunshan
dc.contributor.authorAgnello, Danielle Marie
dc.contributor.authorMessiha, Katrina
dc.contributor.authorBeeckman, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorZapata-Restrepo, Jorge R.
dc.contributor.authorCardon, Greet
dc.contributor.authorChastin, Sebastien F. M.
dc.contributor.authorGiné-Garriga, Maria
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-06T11:54:22Z
dc.date.available2024-10-06T11:54:22Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/4423
dc.description.abstractBackground By including the needs and perspectives of relevant stakeholders, co-creation is seen as a promising approach for tackling complex public health problems. However, recommendations and guidance on how to plan and implement co-creation are lacking. By identifying and analysing existing implementation and evaluation frame‐ works for public health, this study aims to ofer key recommendations for professional stakeholders and researchers wanting to adopt a co-creation approach to public health interventions. Methods Firstly, PubMed and CINAHL databases were screened for articles introducing original implementa‐ tion and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions. Backwards snowballing techniques were applied to the included papers. Secondly, identifed frameworks were classifed and relevant data extracted, including steps and constructs present in the frameworks. Lastly, recommendations were derived by conducting thematic analysis on the included frameworks. Results Thirty frameworks were identifed and data related to their nature and scope extracted. The frameworks’ prominent steps and constructs were also retrieved. Recommendations related to implementation and evaluation in the context of co-creation were included. Conclusion When engaging in co-creation, we recommend including implementation considerations from an early stage and suggest adopting a systems thinking as a way to explore multiple levels of infuence, contextual settings and systems from an early planning stage. We highlight the importance of partnering with stakeholders and sug‐ gest applying an evaluation design that is iterative and cyclical, which pays particular attention to the experience of the engaged co-creators.ca
dc.format.extent12ca
dc.language.isoengca
dc.publisherBMCca
dc.relationAquesta versió té material suplementarica
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Research Policy and Systems (2024) 22:39ca
dc.rights© L'autor/aca
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalca
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.otherSalut públicaca
dc.subject.otherEvaluacióca
dc.subject.otherImplementacióca
dc.subject.otherRevisióca
dc.titleA review of implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions to inform co-creation: a Health CASCADE studyca
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapca
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01126-6ca
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EU/H2020/Grant agreement No. 956501ca
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© L'autor/a
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint