dc.contributor | Universitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport Blanquerna | |
dc.contributor.author | Longworth, Giuliana R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Goh, Kunshan | |
dc.contributor.author | Agnello, Danielle Marie | |
dc.contributor.author | Messiha, Katrina | |
dc.contributor.author | Beeckman, Melanie | |
dc.contributor.author | Zapata-Restrepo, Jorge R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cardon, Greet | |
dc.contributor.author | Chastin, Sebastien F. M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Giné-Garriga, Maria | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-06T11:54:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-06T11:54:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/4423 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background By including the needs and perspectives of relevant stakeholders, co-creation is seen as a promising
approach for tackling complex public health problems. However, recommendations and guidance on how to plan
and implement co-creation are lacking. By identifying and analysing existing implementation and evaluation frame‐
works for public health, this study aims to ofer key recommendations for professional stakeholders and researchers
wanting to adopt a co-creation approach to public health interventions.
Methods Firstly, PubMed and CINAHL databases were screened for articles introducing original implementa‐
tion and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions. Backwards snowballing techniques were applied
to the included papers. Secondly, identifed frameworks were classifed and relevant data extracted, including steps
and constructs present in the frameworks. Lastly, recommendations were derived by conducting thematic analysis
on the included frameworks.
Results Thirty frameworks were identifed and data related to their nature and scope extracted. The frameworks’
prominent steps and constructs were also retrieved. Recommendations related to implementation and evaluation
in the context of co-creation were included.
Conclusion When engaging in co-creation, we recommend including implementation considerations from an early
stage and suggest adopting a systems thinking as a way to explore multiple levels of infuence, contextual settings
and systems from an early planning stage. We highlight the importance of partnering with stakeholders and sug‐
gest applying an evaluation design that is iterative and cyclical, which pays particular attention to the experience
of the engaged co-creators. | ca |
dc.format.extent | 12 | ca |
dc.language.iso | eng | ca |
dc.publisher | BMC | ca |
dc.relation | Aquesta versió té material suplementari | ca |
dc.relation.ispartof | Health Research Policy and Systems (2024) 22:39 | ca |
dc.rights | © L'autor/a | ca |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | ca |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject.other | Salut pública | ca |
dc.subject.other | Evaluació | ca |
dc.subject.other | Implementació | ca |
dc.subject.other | Revisió | ca |
dc.title | A review of implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions to inform co-creation: a Health CASCADE study | ca |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca |
dc.rights.accessLevel | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.embargo.terms | cap | ca |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01126-6 | ca |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EU/H2020/Grant agreement No. 956501 | ca |
dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ca |