Different Modelling Purposes
Author
Edmonds, Bruce
Le Page, Christophe
Bithell, Mike
Chattoe-Brown, Edmund
Grimm, Volker
Meyer, Ruth
Montañola i Sales, Cristina
Ormerod, Paul
Root, Hilton
Squazzoni, Flaminio
Other authors
Universitat Ramon Llull. IQS
Publication date
2019-06-30ISSN
1460-7425
Abstract
How one builds, checks, validates and interprets a model depends on its ‘purpose’. This is true even if the same model code is used for di erent purposes. This means that a model built for one purpose but then used for another needs to be re-justified for the new purpose and this will probably mean it also has to be rechecked, re-validated and maybe even re-built in a di erentway. Herewe reviewsome of the di erent purposes for a simulation model of complex social phenomena, focusing on seven in particular: prediction, explanation, description, theoretical exploration, illustration, analogy, and social interaction. The paper looks at some of the implications in terms of the ways in which the intended purpose might fail. This analysis motivates some of the ways in which these ‘dangers’ might be avoided or mitigated. It also looks at the ways that a confusion of modelling purposes can fatally weaken modelling projects, whilst giving a false sense of their quality. These distinctions clarify some previous debates as to the best modelling strategy (e.g. KISS and KIDS). The paper ends with a plea for modellers to be clear concerning which purpose they are justifying their model against.
Document Type
Article
Document version
Published version
Language
English
Subject (CDU)
3 - Social Sciences
Keywords
Models
Purpose
Prediction
Explanation
Theory
Analogy
Pages
30 p.
Publisher
JASSS
Is part of
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Rights
© L'autor/a
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/