Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributorUniversitat Ramon Llull. La Salle
dc.contributorUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana
dc.contributorUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya
dc.contributor.authorBesné Yanguas, Alia
dc.contributor.authorPérez, Miguel Ángel
dc.contributor.authorNecchi, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorPeña Camarillas, Enric
dc.contributor.authorNavarro Delgado, Isidro
dc.contributor.authorRedondo Domínguez, Ernesto
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, David
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-20T18:02:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-02T06:48:21Z
dc.date.available2021-07-20T18:02:56Z
dc.date.available2023-10-02T06:48:21Z
dc.date.created2021-04
dc.date.issued2021-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/3485
dc.description.abstractSince the international governmental institutions required and/or recommended (accord-ing to the regulations of each country and continent) all public works to be certified in the BIM(Building Information Modeling) methodology, public and private institutions and universities havesought to integrate BIM into their production and educational processes. This requires the universityacademic environment to focus its efforts on training students in this methodology, as they will needto apply it in any future work activities related to architecture and construction. This article seeks toanalyze which methods are being used by higher education institutions around the world to integrateBIM implementation in AEC (architecture, engineering, and construction) degrees and to determineif a set of regulatory guidelines exists that could serve as a common foundation for institutions toimprove this integration process. To this end, a systematic literature review was carried out on WOSand SCOPUS by applying the PRISMA statement methodology. Inclusion and exclusion criteria wereselected based on keywords, abstracts, and full content of the articles. In the end, 23 articles werethoroughly studied, the integration and evaluation methods analyzed, and results obtained. Theanalysis shows a consensus on the need to develop common academic guidelines across universitycenters that define a strategy for curriculum modifications and teaching and learning strategies.Finally, future lines of research are identified.eng
dc.format.extent23 p.cat
dc.language.isoengcat
dc.publisherMDPIcat
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences, 2021, 11 (12)cat
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights© L'autor/a.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceRECERCAT (Dipòsit de la Recerca de Catalunya)
dc.subject.otherModelatge d'informació de construcciócat
dc.subject.otherArquitectura -- Innovacions tecnològiquescat
dc.subject.otherConstrucció -- Innovacions tecnològiquescat
dc.subject.otherEnsenyament universitari -- Innovacions tecnològiquescat
dc.titleA Systematic Review of Current Strategies and Methods for BIM Implementation in the Academic Fieldcat
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlecat
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioncat
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscapcat
dc.subject.udc004
dc.subject.udc378
dc.subject.udc62
dc.subject.udc69
dc.subject.udc72
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app11125530cat


Ficheros en el ítem

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution 4.0 International
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Compartir en TwitterCompartir en LinkedinCompartir en FacebookCompartir en TelegramCompartir en WhatsappImprimir