Show simple item record

dc.contributorUniversitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Psicologia, Ciències de l’Educació i de l’Esport Blanquerna
dc.contributor.authorArias Pujol, Eulàlia
dc.contributor.authorAnguera, M. Teresa
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-06T08:19:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-13T08:07:57Z
dc.date.available2018-02-06T08:19:53Z
dc.date.available2023-07-13T08:07:57Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/2280
dc.description.abstractGroup psychotherapy is a useful clinical practice for adolescents with mental health issues. Groups typically consist of young people of similar ages but with different personalities, and this results in a complex communication network. The goal of group psychoanalytic psychotherapy is to improve participants' mentalization abilities, facilitating interactions between peers and their therapist in a safe, containing environment. The main aim of this study was to analyze conversation turn-taking between a lead therapist, a co-therapist, and six adolescents over the course of 24 treatment sessions divided into four blocks over 8 months. We employed a mixed-methods design based on systematic observation, which we consider to be a mixed method itself, as the qualitative data collected in the initial observation phase is transformed into quantitative data and subsequently interpreted qualitatively with the aid of clinical vignettes. The observational methodology design was nomothetic, follow-up, and multidimensional. The choice of methodology is justified as we used an ad-hoc observation instrument combining a field format and a category system. Interobserver agreement was analyzed quantitatively by Cohen's kappa using the free QSEQ5 software program. Once we had confirmed the reliability of the data, these were analyzed by polar coordinate analysis, which is a powerful data reduction technique that provides a vector representation of relationships between categories. The results show significant relationships between the therapist and (1) the activation of turn-taking by the participants and the co-therapist and silence and (2) conversation-facilitating interventions and interventions designed to improve mentalization abilities. Detailed analysis of questions demonstrating interest in others showed how the communication changed from radial interactions stemming from the therapist at the beginning of therapy to circular interactions half way through. Repetition was found to be a powerful conversation facilitator. The results also illustrate the role of the therapist, who (1) did not facilitate interventions by all participants equally, (2) encouraged turn-taking from more inhibited members of the group, (3) stimulated conversation from the early stages of therapy, and (4) favored mentalization toward the end. Despite its complexity, polar coordinate analysis produces easy-to-interpret results in the form of vector maps.eng
dc.format.extent13 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in psychology, 2017, Vol. 8, Article 1188
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights© Arias-Pujol and Anguera
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceRECERCAT (Dipòsit de la Recerca de Catalunya)
dc.subject.otherTeràpia de grup
dc.subject.otherAdolescents--Psicologia
dc.titleObservation of Interactions in Adolescent Group Therapy: A Mixed Methods Study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscap
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01188


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint