Show simple item record

dc.contributorUniversitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna
dc.contributorUniversitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Psicologia, Ciències de l’Educació i de l’Esport Blanquerna
dc.contributor.authorAguilera-Castells, Joan
dc.contributor.authorBuscà Safont-Tria, Bernat
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Jose
dc.contributor.authorSolana-Tramunt, Mònica
dc.contributor.authorFort Vanmeerhaeghe, Azahara
dc.contributor.authorRey Abella, Ferran
dc.contributor.authorBantulà, Jaume
dc.contributor.authorPeña, Javier (Peña López)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-29T11:10:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-13T07:32:29Z
dc.date.available2019-10-29T11:10:38Z
dc.date.available2023-07-13T07:32:29Z
dc.date.created2019-05
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/1950
dc.description.abstractPractitioners of strength and conditioning are increasingly using vibration and unstable environments to enhance training effects. However, little evidence has been found comparing the use of suspension devices and vibratory platforms used in the Bulgarian squat. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to examine the effect of suspension devices (TRX®), unstable surfaces (BOSU®), and vibration plates on muscle activity and force during the Bulgarian squat. Twenty physically active male students (age = 24.40 ± 3.63 years) performed a set of five repetitions of Bulgarian squats, suspended lunges, suspended lunges-BOSU, suspended lunges-Vibro30, and suspended lunges-Vibro40 (vibration 30 Hz or 40 Hz and 4 mm of amplitude). A randomized within-subject design was used to compare leg muscle activity, vertical ground reaction forces, and force exerted on the strap across the five exercises. Results showed no significant differences in muscle activity between the Bulgarian squat and suspended lunge (p = 0.109, d = 2.84). However, the suspended lunge significantly decreased muscle activation compared to the suspended lunge-BOSU (p = 0.012, d = 0.47), suspended lunge-Vibro30 (p = 0.001, d = 1.26), and suspended lunge-Vibro40 (p = 0.000, d = 1.51). Likewise, the Bulgarian squat achieved lower activity than the suspended lunge-Vibro40 (p = 0.010, d = 0.96). The force on the strap significantly decreased in the suspended lunge-BOSU compared to the suspended lunge-Vibro30 (p = 0.009, d = 0.56). The suspended lunge achieved higher front leg force production than the Bulgarian squat (p = 0.006, d = 0.48). In conclusion, leaning the rear leg on a suspension device does not provoke an increase in the activation of the front leg during the Bulgarian squat but increases the vertical ground reaction forces. Thus, the use of unstable surfaces or vibration plates for the front leg increased muscular activity when performing a suspended lunge.eng
dc.format.extent20 p.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS One, 2019, vol. 14, núm. 8:e0221710
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights© L'autor/a
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceRECERCAT (Dipòsit de la Recerca de Catalunya)
dc.subject.otherCames -- Músculs
dc.subject.otherVibració -- Ús terapèutic
dc.subject.otherCondició física
dc.titleMuscle activity of Bulgarian squat: effects of additional vibration, suspension and unstable surface
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.rights.accessLevelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.embargo.termscap
dc.subject.udc79
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221710


Files in this item

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Share on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on FacebookShare on TelegramShare on WhatsappPrint