Effectiveness of Interventions for Reducing Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
View/Open
This document contains embargoed files until 2026-05-01
Author
Other authors
Publication date
2025-05Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing sedentary behavior
(SB) and/or increasing physical activity (PA) among adults aged _60 years residing in long-term
care facilities (LTCFs).
Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and pre-post interventional
studies targeting SB reduction and/or increase in PA, following PRISMA guidelines.
Setting and Participants: Six studies conducted in LTCFs across Europe and North America,
involving 403 participants aged ≥60 years.
Methods: We searched 7 databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, PEDro, ScienceDirect,
ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar) up until January 2025 and screened reference lists for
additional articles. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, resulting
in the inclusion of 6 studies: 3 prepost interventional studies and 3 RCTs. The primary outcome
was time spent in SB, measured via device or self-report, whereas secondary outcomes included
quality of life, depression, physical health (physical function, cardiovascular and metabolic
health, adverse events), and social isolation.
Results: One RCT found that the intervention reduced SB compared to usual care, whereas the
other studies reported nonsignificant improvements. Notably, interventions focused on SB rather
than PA showed potential positive effects on reducing sedentary time. However, limitations such as small sample sizes, heterogeneity, and risk of bias were common, highlighting the need for
further research.
Conclusions and Implications: In conclusion, this review emphasizes the uncertainty surrounding
the effectiveness of SB reduction interventions in LTCFs. Future research should refine
methodologies, standardize interventions and outcome measures, and build a stronger evidence
base to guide intervention development and improve well-being in LTCF residents. Findings also
suggest that SB-focused strategies may be more effective than PA-based ones alone and could
inform policy and practice development in LTCFs.
Document Type
Article
Document version
Accepted version
Language
English
Pages
19
Publisher
Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association
Is part of
JAMDA. Journal of the Post-Actute and Long-Term Care Medical Association, 2025;26(7):105685.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Rights
© Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/