Navigating process evaluation in co-creation: a Health CASCADE scoping review of used frameworks and assessed components
Ver/Abrir
Autor/a
Longworth, Giuliana R.
Goh, Kunshan
Agnello, Danielle Marie
McCaffrey, Lauren
Zapata-Restrepo, Jorge R.
Castin, Sebastien
Giné-Garriga, Maria
Otros/as autores/as
Universitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport Blanquerna
Fecha de publicación
2024-07Resumen
Background Co-creation is seen as a way to ensure
all relevant needs and perspectives are included and to
increase its potential for beneficial effects and uptake
process evaluation is crucial. However, existing process
evaluation frameworks have been built on practices
characterised by top-down developed and implemented
interventions and may be limited in capturing essential
elements of co-creation. This study aims to provide a
review of studies planning and/or conducting a process
evaluation of public health interventions adopting a cocreation approach and aims to derive assessed process
evaluation components, used frameworks and insights into
formative and/or participatory evaluation.
Methods We searched for studies on Scopus and the
Health CASCADE Co-Creation Database. Co-authors
performed a concept-mapping exercise to create a set
of overarching dimensions for clustering the identified
process evaluation components.
Results 54 studies were included. Conceptualisation
of process evaluation included in studies concerned
intervention implementation, outcome evaluation,
mechanisms of impact, context and the co-creation
process. 22 studies (40%) referenced ten existing process
evaluation or evaluation frameworks and most referenced
were the frameworks developed by Moore et al (14%),
Saunders et al (5%), Steckler and Linnan (5%) and Nielsen
and Randall (5%).
38 process evaluation components were identified, with a
focus on participation (48%), context (40%), the experience
of co-creators (29%), impact (29%), satisfaction (25%) and
fidelity (24%).
13 studies (24%) conducted formative evaluation, 37
(68%) conducted summative evaluation and 2 studies (3%)
conducted participatory evaluation.
Conclusion The broad spectrum of process evaluation
components addressed in co-creation studies, covering
both the evaluation of the co-creation process and the
intervention implementation, highlights the need for
a process evaluation tailored to co-creation studies.
This work provides an overview of process evaluation
components, clustered in dimensions and reflections
which researchers and practitioners can use to plan a process evaluation of a co-creation process and
intervention.
Tipo de documento
Artículo
Versión del documento
Versión publicada
Lengua
English
Palabras clave
Co-creació
Salut pública
Revisió
Páginas
14
Publicado por
BMJ Journals
Publicado en
BMJ Global Health 2024;9:e014483
Número del acuerdo de la subvención
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EU/H2020/Grant agreement No. 956501
Documentos relacionados
Aquesta versió té material suplementari
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
Derechos
© L'autor/a
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/